Travis Posted April 3, 2008 Report Share Posted April 3, 2008 What will I have to do to get EasyXML working on the Mac? I don't see VIPM 1.1 for MacOS--will 1.0 do the job? If so... I tried installing VIPM 1.0 and I'm having trouble registering LabVIEW 8.5. I found that VI Server was not attached to any port in LabVIEW at first, but when I enabled it and rebooted things almost started working. In VIPM when I click the TCP/IP port Test button, it does successfully launch LabVIEW 8.5 (the only LV installed currently); however, I still get an error message in VIPM 1.0: "VIPM could not connect to No LV Version Selected. Another LabVIEW Version is at the specified port or path. Please claose all LabVIEW verions and try again. Also verify that each register LabVIEW verion is assigned a unique TCP\IP access port." I also tried a different port number with no luck. Thanks, Travis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Kring Posted April 3, 2008 Report Share Posted April 3, 2008 Hi Travis, VIPM 1.0 does not work with LabVIEW 8.5, which is what you're seeing. Support for VIPM 1.1 on Macs has been held up, due to some MacIntel complications, but we're working on it and hopefully it won't take too much longer. If you are in a real bind about how to get EasyXML working on Mac, there are options. Probably, the easiest is to copy the installed EasyXML and OpenG files from another version of LabVIEW (possibly on another computer) that VIPM is able to target, located here: \user.lib\_OpenG.lib\* \vi.lib\addons\_JKI Toolkits\* Also, if you need the OpenG and JKI Toolkit palette categories, copy the mnu files located here: \menus\Categories\OpenG.mnu \menus\Categories\JKI Toolkits.mnu We appologize for this inconvenience. Please let us know if you have further questions about getting EasyXML working on your Mac. We're committed to getting a temporary fix working for you, now, and getting VIPM 1.1 working, as soon as we can. Thanks, -Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Travis Posted April 4, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 4, 2008 The work-around worked fine--thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Kring Posted April 4, 2008 Report Share Posted April 4, 2008 The work-around worked fine--thanks. Thanks for the update. That's great to hear. -Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.